Fact-checking is an essential part of the news publication process. Professional journalists have established core principles in order to help ensure fair and rigorous fact-checking in news reporting:
"We believe nonpartisan and transparent fact-checking can be a powerful instrument of accountability journalism; conversely, unsourced or biased fact-checking can increase distrust in the media and experts while polluting public understanding."
1. Spin
3. Opinion Statements Presented as Facts
4. Sensationalism/Emotionalism
6. Mind Reading
7. Slant
8. Flawed Logic
10. Omission of Source Attribution
Click here to download as a PDF.
Source: AllSides
Least Biased reporting:
Reports stories on a wide variety of topics
Avoids using "loaded" terms that appeal to emotion or stereotypes
Supports all reporting with extensive sourcing/documentation
Most Biased or Questionable Reporting:
Uses wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeals to emotion or stereotypes
Reports a preponderance of stories espousing a single viewpoint and omits reporting of information that may challenge this viewpoint
Reports misleading, poorly supported or inaccurate information
Source: Media Bias/Fact Check
Professional journalists - television, radio, online and print reporters - have established high ethical standards for their field:
"The Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics is a statement of abiding principles supported by explanations and position papers that address changing journalistic practices...Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. Ethical journalism strives to ensure the free exchange of information that is accurate, fair and thorough. An ethical journalist acts with integrity."
The News Leaders Association is a professional organization for news/media editors that offers both advocacy and developmental training for industry professionals. Its goal is "to foster and develop the highest standards of trustworthy, truth-seeking journalism."
A 2020 Pew Research study found that over 25% of American adults get their news from YouTube. As a result, they may fail to distinguish the difference between information obtained from reliable news sources and information found via independent content creators, who "are more likely to cover subjects negatively [and] discuss conspiracy theories."
From Oxford Dictionaries:
Fact-checkers consult primary sources, non-partisan government agencies and experts on relevant topics in order to verify information included in news reporting.
How Factcheck.org verifies information:
"A fact-checker goes through the story line by line, word by word, to make sure that every fact is correct and every statement we make and conclusion we draw is accurate and based on the evidence. All of our stories contain hyperlinks to source material, so that readers can check our facts...If any new information comes to light after we publish a story that materially changes that story, we will clarify, correct or update our story and provide a note to readers that explains the change, why it was made and the date it was made."
In general, you can try the above moves in sequence. If you find success at any stage, your work might be done.
When you encounter a claim you want to check, your first move might be to check sites like Politifact, Snopes, or even Wikipedia to see if they have researched the claim (Check for previous work). You can also do a quick search like [claim] + "hoax."
If you can’t find previous work on the claim, start by trying to trace the claim to the source. If the claim is about research, try to find the journal in which it appeared. If the claim is about an event, try to find the news publication in which it was originally reported (Go upstream).
If you find that the source of the claim is not reliable, read across reliable sources to assess further. (Read laterally).
And if at any point you fail–if the source you find is not trustworthy, complex questions emerge, or the claim turns out to have multiple sub-claims–then you circle back, and start a new process. Rewrite the claim. Try a new search of fact-checking sites, or find an alternate source (Circle back).
For more information on fact-checking strategies see Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers.
Adapted from Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers by Michael A. Caulfield and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Here's a quick video on lateral reading from MediaWise:
Video Source: Poynter Institute/MediaWise
A 2023 Pew Research Fact Sheet states that half of U.S. adults say they get news "at least sometimes" from social media platforms, demonstrating that social media continues to play a critical role in our news consumption. Several trends have emerged per a 2024 Pew Study:
However, users continue to expect inaccurate news as part of their social media consumption, and have grown increasingly concerned about it per another 2024 Pew Study.
A 2018 Pew Research study found that "newsroom employees are more likely to be white and male than U.S. workers overall." This is troubling given the results of 2013 media study on diversity that argues that the type of stories that get reported is likely to depend upon who is doing the reporting. However, the Pew report did note that younger reporters are more likely to embody racial, ethnic and gender diversity than their older colleagues.