MU LibraryFINDGET HELPSERVICESABOUT Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Library Research Awards: Essay Evaluation Rubric

Evaluation

The essay describing research techniques used will be given the most weight in the judging process. The essay should demonstrate the applicant’s: identification of sources consulted, description of searching process, and evidence of learning. Submissions will be judged on a 40 point scale. Up to 10 points will be awarded for each of four categories.

Essay Evaluation Rubric

RUBRIC FOR EVALUATION OF LIBRARY RESEARCH AWARD ESSAY

 

Developing (1-3 pts)

Competent (4-6 pts)

Exemplary (7-10 pts)

Total Pts.

Process

  • Fails to explain or recreate the search process
  • Does not offer insights on how the project contributed to overall growth as a scholar
  • Explains or recreates the search process in vague terms
  • Offers limited insights on how the project contributed to overall growth as a scholar
  • Explains or recreates the search process with clear detail
  • Offers in-depth insights on how the project contributed to overall growth as a scholar

 

Search Strategies

  • No focused research topic or thesis statement is stated
  • Does not identify appropriate keywords
  • Search strategies are not described

 

  • Research topic or thesis is present, but not focused
  • Identifies appropriate keywords
  • Search strategies are described in vague or general terms
  • Basic and some advanced search techniques used
  • Research topic or thesis is focused and clearly stated
  • Identifies appropriate keywords
  • Search strategies are explicitly described, includes challenges, information gaps, and responses to failure
  • Advanced search techniques are demonstrated

 

Resource Use

 

  • Does not display awareness of resources appropriate to the project
  • Limited use of research tools and services
  • Lacks criteria for evaluation of sources
  • Sources are not cited in a standard and consistent format
  • Displays awareness of some resources appropriate to the project (e.g. databases, Internet, archives, research guides, library instruction, ILL, consultations)
  • Displays use of a variety of research tools and services
  • Criteria for evaluation of sources is incomplete or unclear
  • Sources are cited in a standard format but contain errors or missing elements
  • Displays extensive awareness of resources appropriate to the project (e.g. databases, Internet, archives, research guides, library instruction, ILL, consultations)
  • Wide-ranging use of research tools/services with clear explanation of the impact on their project
  • Clearly explains criteria for evaluation of sources
  • Sources are properly cited in a standard format